1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 2000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 290 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fairlane | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1968 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |