1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2009 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2009 Mazda B2300 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2009 Mazda B2300. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda B2300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 625 kg more than 2009 Mazda B2300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2009 Mazda B2300 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Fairlane | B2300 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6550 cc | 2266 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2840 mm |
