1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 130 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-7.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fairlane | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 69 L |