1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2009 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Outlook (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Saturn Outlook weights approximately 155 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2009 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Ford | Saturn |
Model | Fairlane | Outlook |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6550 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3030 mm |