1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2010 Aston Martin Rapide
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin Rapide is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin Rapide is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin Rapide (470 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 318 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin Rapide should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Aston Martin Rapide weights approximately 550 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2010 Aston Martin Rapide | |
Make | Ford | Aston Martin |
Model | Fairlane | Rapide |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 470 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5019 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 2141 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 90 L |