1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Fairlane | Cruze |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6550 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4597 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2685 mm |