1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (200 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 265 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Fairlane | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2845 mm |