1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2010 Mercury Mariner

To start off, 2010 Mercury Mariner is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercury Mariner (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 115 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Mariner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Ford Fairlane 2010 Mercury Mariner
Make Ford Mercury
Model Fairlane Mariner
Year Released 1968 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5766 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 152 HP 171 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 1515 kg
Vehicle Length 5110 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1970 mm 1806 mm
Vehicle Height 1040 mm 1727 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2619 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 62 L