1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2011 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2011 Fiat Siena is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 310 kg more than 2011 Fiat Siena.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Fairlane | 2011 Fiat Siena | |
| Make | Ford | Fiat |
| Model | Fairlane | Siena |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5766 cc | 1697 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 47 L |
