1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2012 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Pathfinder (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 670 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2012 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fairlane | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4884 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 80 L |