1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2012 Zenvo ST1
To start off, 2012 Zenvo ST1 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Zenvo ST1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Zenvo ST1 (1,104 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 1023 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Zenvo ST1 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Zenvo ST1 weights approximately 66 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2012 Zenvo ST1 | |
Make | Ford | Zenvo |
Model | Fairlane | ST1 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 7000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 1104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1376 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4665 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2041 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1198 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3055 mm |