1968 Ford Fairlane vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,998 cc (24 cylinders), 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (227 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 390 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Fairlane | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fairlane | Outlander |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 24 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4665 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2670 mm |