1968 Ford GT 40 vs. 1981 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 1981 Toyota Tercel is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,948 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1981 Toyota Tercel.
Because 1968 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Toyota Tercel has automatic transmission and 1968 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 1968 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Toyota Tercel will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford GT 40 | 1981 Toyota Tercel | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | GT 40 | Tercel |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4948 cc | 1293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 424 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2510 mm |
