1968 Ford GT 40 vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford GT 40 (424 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. (408 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 weights approximately 445 kg more than 1968 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 has automatic transmission and 1968 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 1968 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford GT 40 | 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | GT 40 | F200 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4948 cc | 5987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 424 HP | 408 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1405 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2700 mm |
