1968 Ford GT 40 vs. 1996 Saturn SL

To start off, 1996 Saturn SL is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,948 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford GT 40 (424 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 324 more horse power than 1996 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Saturn SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Saturn SL weights approximately 96 kg more than 1968 Ford GT 40.

Because 1968 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Saturn SL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford GT 40 (637 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 479 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Saturn SL. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1968 Ford GT 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Saturn SL.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Ford GT 40 1996 Saturn SL
Make Ford Saturn
Model GT 40 SL
Year Released 1968 1996
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 4948 cc 1901 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 424 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 637 Nm 158 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 960 kg 1056 kg
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 980 mm 1400 mm