1968 Ford GT 40 vs. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept
To start off, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,948 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (791 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 367 more horse power than 1968 Ford GT 40. (424 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (800 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford GT 40. (637 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford GT 40. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept has automatic transmission and 1968 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 1968 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford GT 40 | 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | GT 40 | Charger RT Concept |
Year Released | 1968 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4948 cc | 3522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 424 HP | 791 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 637 Nm | 800 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |