1968 Ford GT 40 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford GT 40 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 380 kg more than 1968 Ford GT 40.
Because 1968 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford GT 40 (637 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 482 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1968 Ford GT 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford GT 40 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | GT 40 | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 424 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 637 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4097 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1993 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 47 L |
