1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 1968 Ford Mustang is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 195 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Mustang | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
| Make | Ford | Hudson |
| Model | Mustang | Super Wasp |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7010 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 140 HP |
| Torque | 597 Nm | 349 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 105 mm | 90.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101.2 mm | 111.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 7.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3030 mm |
