1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1953 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1968 Ford Mustang is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Mustang weights approximately 49 kg more than 1953 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Mustang | 1953 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Mustang | CJ |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1953 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4733 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1116 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2040 mm |
