1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 1968 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 316 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 557 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Mustang | 1963 Seat 600 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Mustang | 600 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 7010 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 19 HP |
Torque | 597 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2010 mm |