1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 1968 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 282 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 514 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Mustang | 1964 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | Mustang | 1100 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7010 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 597 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2380 mm |
