1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1965 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 1968 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1968 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 725 kg more than 1968 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Mustang | 1965 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Mustang | MK X |
Year Released | 1968 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 63 L |