1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1966 Saab 96
To start off, 1968 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Saab 96. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Saab 96 would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1966 Saab 96. (64 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 Saab 96. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Mustang weights approximately 292 kg more than 1966 Saab 96. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Saab 96, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Mustang | 1966 Saab 96 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Mustang | 96 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1966 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 873 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 38 L |