1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 1968 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1966 Volvo 144. (124 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 Volvo 144.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volvo 144. (167 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volvo 144.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Mustang | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mustang | 144 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7010 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 124 HP |
Torque | 597 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 105 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.2 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2620 mm |