1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Renault Siete
To start off, 1981 Renault Siete is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 291 more horse power than 1981 Renault Siete. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault Siete.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 513 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault Siete. (84 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault Siete.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Mustang | 1981 Renault Siete | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Mustang | Siete |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7010 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 44 HP |
| Torque | 597 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 105 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101.2 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2540 mm |
