1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1991 Honda Accord
To start off, 1991 Honda Accord is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 187 more horse power than 1991 Honda Accord. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1991 Honda Accord.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Honda Accord. (198 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Mustang | 1991 Honda Accord | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Mustang | Accord |
Year Released | 1968 | 1991 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7010 cc | 2154 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 597 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2730 mm |