1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Peugeot 405
To start off, 1992 Peugeot 405 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 215 more horse power than 1992 Peugeot 405. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Peugeot 405.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Peugeot 405, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Peugeot 405. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Peugeot 405.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Mustang | 1992 Peugeot 405 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Mustang | 405 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7010 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 597 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 105 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.2 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2710 mm |