1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz G
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz G is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 118 more horse power than 1996 Mercedes-Benz G. (217 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1996 Mercedes-Benz G.
Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz G is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz G will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mercedes-Benz G. (300 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mercedes-Benz G.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Mustang | 1996 Mercedes-Benz G | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Mustang | G |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7010 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 217 HP |
| Torque | 597 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 105 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101.2 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2860 mm |
