1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 665 kg more than 1968 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Mustang | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mustang | Challenger |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2730 mm |