1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1997 Honda CRX

To start off, 1997 Honda CRX is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 210 more horse power than 1997 Honda CRX. (125 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1997 Honda CRX.

Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Honda CRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 456 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Honda CRX. (141 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Honda CRX.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Ford Mustang 1997 Honda CRX
Make Ford Honda
Model Mustang CRX
Year Released 1968 1997
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7010 cc 1668 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 335 HP 125 HP
Torque 597 Nm 141 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 105 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 101.2 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.6:1 9.3:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4010 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2380 mm