1968 Ford Mustang vs. 1997 Peugeot 605
To start off, 1997 Peugeot 605 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 199 more horse power than 1997 Peugeot 605. (136 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1997 Peugeot 605.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Peugeot 605, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 417 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Peugeot 605. (180 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Peugeot 605.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Mustang | 1997 Peugeot 605 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | Mustang | 605 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7010 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 136 HP |
| Torque | 597 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 105 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101.2 mm | 86 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2810 mm |
