1968 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP) has 125 more horse power than 1968 Ford Mustang. (335 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm) has 419 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Mustang | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7010 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 460 HP |
Torque | 597 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2580 mm |