1968 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Panoz AIV
To start off, 2000 Panoz AIV is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Panoz AIV (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1968 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Panoz AIV should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Panoz AIV weights approximately 15 kg more than 1968 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Mustang | 2000 Panoz AIV | |
| Make | Ford | Panoz |
| Model | Mustang | AIV |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4733 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 59 L |
