1968 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Toyota Picnic

To start off, 2000 Toyota Picnic is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 208 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Picnic. (127 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Picnic.

Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Picnic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Picnic. (181 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Picnic.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Ford Mustang 2000 Toyota Picnic
Make Ford Toyota
Model Mustang Picnic
Year Released 1968 2000
Body Type Coupe Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7010 cc 1988 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 335 HP 127 HP
Torque 597 Nm 181 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.6:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2680 mm