1968 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2001 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 218 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Terrano II. (117 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Terrano II.
Because 2001 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan Terrano II. (197 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan Terrano II.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Mustang | 2001 Nissan Terrano II | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | Terrano II |
Year Released | 1968 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7010 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 117 HP |
Torque | 597 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2660 mm |