1968 Ford Mustang vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (235 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1968 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 775 kg more than 1968 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Ford Mustang 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Ford Jeep
Model Mustang Grand Cherokee
Year Released 1968 2003
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4733 cc 4701 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 217 HP 235 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1165 kg 1940 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4620 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2700 mm