1968 Ford Mustang vs. 2003 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Musso is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2003 SsangYong Musso. (217 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2003 SsangYong Musso.
Because 2003 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 SsangYong Musso. (319 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Ford Mustang | 2003 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Ford | SsangYong |
| Model | Mustang | Musso |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7010 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 217 HP |
| Torque | 597 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Top Speed | 204 km/hour | 176 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2640 mm |
