1968 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 239 more horse power than 2005 Toyota RunX. (96 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota RunX.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 469 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota RunX. (128 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Mustang | 2005 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | RunX |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7010 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 96 HP |
Torque | 597 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 105 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.2 mm | 71.3 mm |
Top Speed | 204 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2610 mm |