1968 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Renault Clio

To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 254 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.

Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 397 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Ford Mustang 2009 Renault Clio
Make Ford Renault
Model Mustang Clio
Year Released 1968 2009
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7010 cc 1460 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 335 HP 81 HP
Torque 597 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 1900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 105 mm 76 mm
Engine Stroke Size 101.2 mm 80.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.6:1 17.9:1
Top Speed 204 km/hour 174 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 2030 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2580 mm