1968 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando. (128 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 500 kg more than 1968 Ford Mustang.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Mustang | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Mustang | Orlando |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2760 mm |