1968 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 181 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Mustang | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Ford | Citroen |
Model | Mustang | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7010 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 597 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 105 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.2 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |