1968 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1484 kg more than 1968 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Mustang | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Mustang | Phantom |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 2649 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5842 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1638 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 100 L |