1968 Ford Zephyr vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 66 kg more than 1968 Ford Zephyr.
Because 1968 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Ford Zephyr | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Zephyr | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1968 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2680 mm |