1968 Holden Belmont vs. 1958 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1968 Holden Belmont is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Talbot T 26 (197 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1968 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Holden Belmont | 1958 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Holden | Talbot |
| Model | Belmont | T 26 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 2130 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1890 mm |
