1968 Holden Belmont vs. 1966 MG MGC
To start off, 1968 Holden Belmont is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Belmont. (163 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1966 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Holden Belmont | 1966 MG MGC | |
| Make | Holden | MG |
| Model | Belmont | MGC |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2130 cc | 2912 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2560 mm |
