1968 Holden Belmont vs. 1972 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 1972 Datsun 240Z is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Datsun 240Z (151 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 132 kg more than 1972 Datsun 240Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Datsun 240Z (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Belmont. (163 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1972 Datsun 240Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Belmont | 1972 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Holden | Datsun |
Model | Belmont | 240Z |
Year Released | 1968 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2130 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2300 mm |