1968 Holden Belmont vs. 1976 Mitsubishi Celeste

To start off, 1976 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mitsubishi Celeste (79 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 282 kg more than 1976 Mitsubishi Celeste.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (163 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mitsubishi Celeste. (117 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mitsubishi Celeste.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Holden Belmont 1976 Mitsubishi Celeste
Make Holden Mitsubishi
Model Belmont Celeste
Year Released 1968 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2130 cc 1439 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 76 HP 79 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 117 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 3800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1200 kg 918 kg
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2350 mm