1968 Holden Belmont vs. 1990 Isuzu Stylus
To start off, 1990 Isuzu Stylus is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Isuzu Stylus (125 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Isuzu Stylus should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 216 kg more than 1990 Isuzu Stylus.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Isuzu Stylus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Holden Belmont | 1990 Isuzu Stylus | |
| Make | Holden | Isuzu |
| Model | Belmont | Stylus |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3043 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 125 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1074 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2460 mm |
