1968 Holden Belmont vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 1994 Rover 200 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 200 (198 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (181 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 115 kg more than 1994 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (407 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (237 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Holden Belmont | 1994 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Holden | Rover |
| Model | Belmont | 200 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5025 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 181 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
