1968 Holden Belmont vs. 1995 Acura Vigor
To start off, 1995 Acura Vigor is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Holden Belmont (181 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1995 Acura Vigor. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 1995 Acura Vigor.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Acura Vigor, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Belmont | 1995 Acura Vigor | |
Make | Holden | Acura |
Model | Belmont | Vigor |
Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5025 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |